GMAT逻辑题练习及答案(373)

2017-09-30 09:51

来源：新东方在线

作者：

　　GMAT逻辑题目:

　　When a group of children who have been watching televisionprograms that include acts of violence is sent to play with a group of childrenwho have been watching programs that do not include acts of violence, thechildren who have been watching violent programs commit a much greater numberof violent acts in their play than do the children who have been watchingnonviolent programs. Therefore, children at play can be prevented fromcommiting violent acts by not being allowed to watch violence on television.

　　The argument in the passage assumes which one of thefollowing?

　　A. Television has aharmful effect on society.

　　B. Parents areresponsible for the acts of their children.

　　C. Violent actionsand passive observation of violent actions are not related.

　　D. There are noother differences between the two groups of children that might account for thedifference in violent behavior.

　　E. Children who aretreated violently will respond with violence.

　　参考答案：D

　　思路：

　　(A) is way too much out of scope, we only know from the information we have been given in the passage that children watching too much violent acts developed a greater number of violent behavior, we don’t know and can’t conclude that the TV as a whole harms the society. Phrase this out.

　　(B) Parents’ responsibility over the matters has no bearing on the causality we discuss here.

　　(C) is opposite from what we learn from the passage. We are try to establish the causality between observation of violent action and violent action committed by children, the fact they are related is the first thing we can ensure from the passage.

　　(E) this may be correct, but just as (B), how the way the children are treated relates to their corresponding action is not the issue at point.

以上就是本文的全部内容，更多精彩请随时关注新东方长春学校官网。