GMAT逻辑题目:

　　Behind the hope that computers can replace teachers is theidea that the student’s understanding of the subject being taught consists inknowing facts and rules, the job of a teacher being to make the facts and rulesexplicit and convey them to the students, either by practice drills or bycoaching. If that were indeed the way the mind works, the teacher couldtransfer facts and rules to the computer, which could replace the teacher asdrillmaster and coach. But since understanding does not consist merely ofknowing facts and rules, but of the grasp of the general concepts underlyingthem, the hope that the computer will eventually replace the teacher isfundamentally misguided.

　　Which one of the following, if true, would most seriouslyundermine the author’s conclusion that computers will not eventually be able toreplace teachers?

　　A. Computers are asgood as teachers at drilling students on facts and rules.

　　B. The job of ateacher is to make students understand the general concepts underlying specificfacts and rules.

　　C. It is possible toprogram computers so that they can teach the understanding of general conceptsthat underlie specific facts and rules.

　　D. Because they arenot subject to human error, computers are better than teachers at conveyingfacts and rules.

　　E. It is notpossible for students to develop an understanding of the concepts underlyingfacts and rules through practice drills and coaching.

　　参考答案:C

　　A. 不是主要的weaken

　　B. 不关题意

　　C. 因为Premise: Thecomputers cannot make students to grasp of the general concepts underlyingthem Conclusion: The computer will not eventually replace theteacher，而C直接补上了这个空缺

　　D. 不关题意

　　E. 反，正好支持了作者的观点

       以上就是本文的全部内容，更多精彩请随时关注新东方长春学校官网。

相关推荐

新东方GMAT全程班

长春新东方留学直通车