Chimps and children, gulls and Greeks—the ethologists go their merry way, comparing bits of human cultural behavior with bits of genetically programmed animal behavior. True, humans are animals; they share certain anatomical features with other animals, and some items of human behavior may seem analogous to the behavior of other animals. But such analogies can seriously mislead if we fail to look at the context of a particular item of behavior. Thus one ethologist compares the presentation of a twig by a cormorant with gift-giving in humans. Yet the cormorant’s twig-presentation simply inhibits attack and is comparable to other appeasement rituals found in many species. Human gift-giving differs in form and purpose not only from culture to culture, but within the same culture in various social contexts. Everything significant about it derives from its social context. Thus, ethologists can accomplish little—beyond reminding us that we are animals—until they study humans as cultural beings.

　　17. The author is primarily concerned with

　　(A) demonstrating the usefulness of ethology in discovering the behavioral limits within which humans operate

　　(B) objecting to the degradation of humanity implicit in the ethologists equation of humans and animals

　　(C) pointing out the dangers inherent in comparing highly dissimilar species, such as humans and cormorants, rather than similar ones, such as humans and apes

　　(D) refuting the idea that the appeasement rituals in human cultural behavior can be profitably subjected to ethological analysis

　　(E) arguing that the ethologists’ assumption that human behavior can be straightforwardly compared with animal behavior is invalid

　　18. The author believes that gift-giving in humans

　　(A) is instinctive behavior

　　(B) is analogous to appeasement rituals in other animals

　　(C) is not an appropriate subject of study for ethologists

　　(D) must be considered within its social context to be properly understood

　　(E) may be a cultural remnant of behavior originally designed to inhibit attack

　　19. The author’s attitude toward contemporary ethologists can best be described as

　　(A) puzzled

　　(B) conciliatory

　　(C) defensive

　　(D) amused

　　(E) disparaging

　　20. Which of the following statements from a report on a cross-cultural study of gift-giving would, if true, most strongly support the author’s assertions concerning human gift-giving?

　　(A) In every culture studied, it was found that some forms of gift-giving are acts of aggression that place the receiver under obligation to the giver.

　　(B) Most governmental taxation systems differentiate between gifts of property given to children during a parent’s lifetime, and a child’s inheritance of the same property from a parent dying without a will.

　　(C) Some gift-giving customs have analogous forms in nearly every culture, as in the almost universal custom of welcoming strangers with gifts of food.

　　(D) In North America, generally speaking, money is an acceptable holiday gift to one’s letter carrier or garbage collector, but is often considered an insult if given to one’s employer, friends, or relatives.

　　(E) Some gifts, being conciliatory in nature, indicate by their costliness the degree of hostility they must appease in the recipient.

　　Few areas of neurobehavioral research seemed more promising in the early sixties than that investigating the relationship between protein synthesis and learning. The conceptual framework for this research was derived directly from molecular biology, which had shown that genetic information is stored in nucleic acids and expressed in proteins. Why not acquired information as well?

　　The first step toward establishing a connection between protein synthesis and learning seemed to be block memory (cause amnesia) by interrupting the production of protein. We were fortunate in finding a nonlethal dosage of puromycin that could, it first appeared, thoroughly inhibit brain protein synthesis as well as reliably produce amnesia.

　　Before the actual connection between protein synthesis and learning could be established, however, we began to have doubts about whether inhibition of protein synthesis was in fact the method by which puromycin produced amnesia. First, other drugs, glutarimides—themselves potent protein-synthesis inhibitors—either failed to cause amnesia in some situations where it could easily be induced by puromycin or produced an amnesia with a different time course from that of puromycin. Second, puromycin was found to inhibit protein synthesis by breaking certain amino-acid chains, and the resulting fragments were suspected of being the actual cause of amnesia in some cases. Third, puromycin was reported to cause abnormalities in the brain, including seizures (发作突然的发作、痉挛或惊厥，如在癫痫或其它疾病中). Thus, not only were decreased protein synthesis and amnesia dissociated, but alternative mechanisms for the amnestic action of puromycin were readily suggested.

　　So, puromycin turned out to be a disappointment. It came to be regarded as a poor agent for amnesia studies, although, of course, it was poor only in the context of our original paradigm of protein-synthesis inhibition. In our frustration, our initial response was simply to change drugs rather than our conceptual orientation. After many such disappointments, however, it now appears unlikely that we will make a firm connection between protein synthesis and learning merely by pursuing the approaches of the past. Our experience with drugs has shown that all the amnestic agents often interfere with memory in ways that seem unrelated to their inhibition of protein synthesis. More importantly, the notion that the interruption or intensification of protein production in the brain can be related in cause-and-effect fashion to learning now seems simplistic and unproductive. Remove the battery from a car and the car will not go. Drive the car a long distance at high speed and the battery will become more highly charged. Neither of these facts proves that the battery powers the car; only a knowledge of the overall automotive system will reveal its mechanism of the locomotion and the role of the battery within that system.

　　21. This passage was most likely excerpted from

　　(A) a diary kept by a practicing neurobehavioral researcher

　　(B) a newspaper article on recent advances in the biochemistry of learning

　　(C) a technical article on experimental techniques in the field of molecular biology

　　(D) an article summarizing a series of scientific investigations in neurobehavioral research

　　(E) a book review in a leading journal devoted to genetic research

　　22. The primary purpose of the passage is to show that extensive experimentation has

　　(A) demonstrated the importance of amino-acid fragmentation in the induction of amnesia

　　(B) cast doubt on the value of puromycin in the neurobehavioral investigation of learning

　　(C) revealed the importance of amnesia in the neurobehavioral study of learning

　　(D) not yet demonstrated the applicability of molecular biology to neurobehavioral research

　　(E) not supported the hypothesis that learning is directly dependent on protein synthesis

　　23. According to the passage, neurobehaviorists initially based their belief that protein synthesis was related to learning on which of the following?

　　(A) Traditional theories about learning

　　(B) New techniques in protein synthesis

　　(C) Previous discoveries in molecular biology

　　(D) Specific research into learning and amnesia

　　(E) Historic experiments on the effects of puromycin

　　24. The passage mentions all of the following as effects of puromycin EXCEPT:

　　(A) brain seizures

　　(B) memory loss

　　(C) inhibition of protein synthesis

　　(D) destruction of genetic information

　　(E) fragmentation of amino-acid chains

　　25. It can be inferred from the passage that, after puromycin was perceived to be a disappointment, researchers did which of the following?

　　(A) They ceased to experiment with puromycin and shifted to other promising protein-synthesis inhibitors.

　　(B) They ceased to experiment with puromycin, and reexamined through experiments the relationship between genetic information and acquired information.

　　(C) The continued to experiment with puromycin, but applied their results to other facets of memory research.

　　(D) They continued to experiment with puromycin, but also tried other protein-synthesis inhibitors.

　　(E) They continued to experiment with puromycin until a new neuroanatomical framework was developed.

　　26. In the example of the car (lines 58-65), the battery is meant to represent which of the following elements in the neurobehavioral research program?

　　(A) Puromycin

　　(B) Amnesia

　　(C) Glutarimides

　　(D) Protein synthesis

　　(E) Acquired information

　　27. Which of the following statements could be most likely to come after the last sentence of the passage?

　　(A) The failures of the past, however, must not impede further research into the amnestic action of protein-synthesis inhibitors.

　　(B) It is a legacy of this research, therefore, that molecular biology’s genetic models have led to disagreements among neurobehaviorists.

　　(C) The ambivalent status of current research, however, should not deter neurobehaviorists from exploring the deeper connections between protein production and learning.

　　(D) It is important in the future, therefore, for behavioral biochemists to emphasize more strongly the place of their specific findings within the overall protein-synthesis model of learning.

　　(E) It is important in the future, therefore, for behavioral biochemists to focus on the several components of the total learning system.

　　答案：17-27：EDEDDECDADE

       以上就是本文的全部内容，更多精彩请随时关注新东方长春学校官网。

相关推荐

长春新东方GRE课程

长春新东方GRE 资讯

长春新东方GRE在线咨询